Showing posts with label methodology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label methodology. Show all posts

Friday, May 6, 2011

Implementation Trauma Continued

I promised a couple of weeks ago that I would dive deeper in to my top five implementation "sins" for both customers and consultants.  I am a bit behind obviously, but let's take a look at #1 on both lists:
For consultants:  Assuming you are the sole reason for the success/failure of the project

For customers:  Assuming that the consulting team is the sole reason for the success/failure of the project

What is wrong with taking sole responsibility for a project? Anyone?  Anyone?  Well, there are number of issues with this approach from both the consultant and customer's perspective. But, let's start with a story about Suzy.  Suzy is a fabulous consultant, and the customer loves her.  Suzy takes care of them, completing many complicated tasks on her own without their input.  She even completed much of the configuration without their assistance, after all, she knows their business so well.  In many ways, the system seems to magically configure and take of itself because Suzy is so efficient.  In this way, Suzy has treated the implementation as if it "her system", fixing and configuring it as needed.

Although Suzy should be applauded for cultivating such a great relationship with the client, we have to question the wisdom of Suzy taking full responsibility for the implementation-- making decisions, completing configuration tasks, and resolving issues with little to no customer input.  And, in this case, the customer loves her for it.  However, does this best serve the customer and the implementation in the long run?  Absolutely not, and here's why:
  1. As much as the customer loves Suzy, she is not their employee.  She does not work in the business on a daily basis, nor will she be around after the implementation is complete. This inherently limits her knowledge of their business, her control over the situation, and her ability to motivate adoption within the ranks.  Customer investment (in terms of resources) is critical to the project's success.  In the end, the system belongs to the customer, not to Suzy.
  2. Suzy is taking responsibilities and tasks away from customer resources, and reducing their opportunity to become involved in the implementation.  If customer resources are given only limited opportunities to participate in the decisions and tasks related to the implementation, a significant opportunity to create excitement about the project is lost.  Without internal advocacy, projects fail.  
  3. With all that Suzy takes care of, when she leaves (as they always do) the system can become "difficult" and "confusing" if there has not been the almost-constant involvement of customer resources in the decision making and configuration process.  From day one, customers must cultivate their own "experts", learning as much as they can from Suzy before she leaves.  Suzy made so many decisions, fixed so many things, and no one is left with that knowledge or understanding once she moves on to another project.  As much as a consultant brings expertise in the software (and hopefully, industry) to the project, it is the customer's perspective that ensures that decisions and processes are owned and supported by the appropriate internal personnel.
It is a natural inclination, I think, for a consultant to want to make an implementation "easy" on a customer. And that natural inclination often leads to situations like Suzy's.  However, as with many things in life, less is learned when we are spared the effort of learning and making decisions. 

As consultants, we need to ensure that the customer is in a position to take responsibility for the success of the implementation with our assistance.  We need to give them the tools, the knowledge, and the resources to do this well.   For this reason, I take the title "consultant" seriously.  I like to think we are not hired to complete a list of specific tasks, but rather to "consult" the customer in how best to complete that list. 

As customers, we want a system that works for us, that our employees feel is beneficial, and that grows with us over time.  To achieve these goals, we must invest early and intensely (in resources, time, and effort) in the success of the project.  To trust any single person, no matter how qualified or competent, is to limit the opportunity for success.  Find your trusted consultants and let them "consult" you on how to reach these goals.

More on #2 on the lists in the coming days :)

Christina Phillips is a Microsoft Certified Trainer and Dynamics GP Certified Professional. She is a supervising consultant with BKD Technologies, providing training, support, and project management services to new and existing Microsoft Dynamics customers.

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Emerging from the Curriculum Caverns

So, I have to start out with an apology of sorts, as I have been heads down for the past 6 weeks working on curriculum updates for Microsoft. So this has become an orphan blog, which Steve so gently reminded me of. So here I am to give you a bit of an update and share what has been keeping me away for so long. I have been updating courseware for the upcoming release of Microsoft Dynamics Sure Step 2010, primarily working on the courseware forProject Managing Microsoft Dynamics® AX, Microsoft Dynamics® GP, and Microsoft Dynamics® NAV Implementations with Microsoft Dynamics® Sure Step (which will be course 80199) and also doing some support around the Using Microsoft Dynamics Sure Step course (80047).

The Project Managing course is a case study based course, which I think is a great collaborative learning experience with students participating in the implementation of a fictional company and working with many of the key tools, templates, and guidance provided in Sure Step. I have experience teaching the course on earlier releases, and I found the shift in perception very interesting. Students often arrived in class aware of Sure Step and its capabilities, but unaware of how to apply the capabilities to their implementation process. After two days with the case study, however, the possibilities became clear and students would leave excited to take what they had learned and apply it practically (and quickly). As an instructor, I love to see that sort of return on the training investment!

The Using Sure Step course is meant to serve as a more general Sure Step training, great for those that need the nuts and bolts approach to understanding the components and benefits of the Sure Step model. This is the courseware we have used internally to train our team members, and I find myself referring to it regularly when I need to refresh my own memory :)

Being the geek girl that I am, I have to say that I came out of the project with a (even for me, an enternally enthusiastic person when it comes to new releases) surprising level of anticipation for the new release. For those of you not yet working with Sure Step, it presents a variety of additional touchpoints to engage you that I hope you will find immediately applicable to your business. And for those of you already working with it, I think you will find that Microsoft listened to the feedback and incorporated more tools and guidance to allow you to take the tool even further in to your implementation processes.

Some key new features (borrowed from the US Partner Executive Program News for Microsoft Dynamics - October 2009):
  • Industry and Cross-Product Content - Positioning and deploying Microsoft Dynamics solutions in a given Industry or its related segments. Industry Pilots for AX Process Manufacturing and CRM Public Sector including the launch of an Industry Playbook for solution selling. Also available will be guidance on xRM platform due-diligence and deployment.
  • Agile Project Type – The addition of this project type which will be especially suitable for implementations where the Microsoft Dynamics solution is positioned as a platform rather than as a commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) system.
  • Organizational Change Management Discipline – New guidance on managing organizational change, to address this common challenge in any ERP or CRM deployment.
  • ISV Guidance – New content that applies to ISV solution positioning and deployment and engagement with the VARs and SIs during sales and implementation. Also, introducing Certified for Microsoft Dynamics alignment recommendations.
  • More collaboration and project tracking capabilities through enhanced SharePoint integration based on Sales, Implementation and Optimization engagements.
  • Enhancements to the Diagnostic Phase including a link between Sure Step and Unleash Your Potential, an Industry Playbook to assist the Sales Roles focused on selling Microsoft Dynamics solutions catered to a specific industry/vertical, a consolidated set of Decision Accelerator Offerings, estimation tools and an enhanced ROI calculator.
  • Enhancements to the Optimization Offerings including further alignment and integration to Support and Services from Microsoft and additional proactive and post go-live offerings.

If you are interested in checking out the upcoming release, I encourage you to check out the latest information available on PartnerSource under Partner Essentials>>Sure Step.

Also, don't forget about these resources for Sure Step as well:

I would love to hear back from those of you who are using Sure Step, thinking about using it, or wondering how/if it can apply to your organization and implementation practices!

In the meantime, I promise more frequent posts in the upcoming couple months (at least until my due date, 1/7/10...it's a girl for those of you who don't already know).

Take care,

Christina